Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

By william 0 Comment February 26, 2020

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day as soon as the project was defeated by voters recently (Image source: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it seems you are not desired in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant was soundly defeated at the polls this as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided that they didn’t want a casino resort in their backyards week.

Three Down for the voter that is( Count

This is becoming a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this month. In cases like this, Foxwoods was searching to develop a $1 billion complex in the town that is boston-area compete for that region’s sole casino license.

As soon as the first returns began coming in, it had been clear that the casino vote wasn’t going to go Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat when the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be going forward. Once all the votes were in, the margin had been enormous: 6,361 against the plan, and 3,480 because of it, or about a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods invested a large amount of cash promoting the casino, nonetheless it wasn’t enough to convince locals that it was a whole lot for the neighborhood economy, apparently. As they promoted the fact that there will be many brand new jobs created and much more than $30 million in new income for the town, the opposition carried the day.

‘Our city wasn’t for sale,’ said John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They desired to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. However the people rose up, pushed back and overwhelmingly said ‘this town isn’t for sale.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase criminal activity into the town, along with depress property values. That, along side warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most Milford residents to vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, more than arguments in favor of creating the resorts.

‘I think individuals are afraid associated with unknown,’ Butera said. ‘There’s a lot of myths about what casinos are…they are not these crazy places that are hedonistic. They truly are actually very nice resorts that have actually much more to do [than] just games.’

The Milford vote was the final one planned at the least for the right moment among a string of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve casinos built in their towns. Applications can still come set for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor license in the state until the end of the however year.

Even though the results that are recent casino companies have actually been poor in these votes, other businesses have experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their neighborhood communities, letting them compete for licenses within the Greater Boston Area and Massachusetts that is western. Three towns have already backed plans to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though just one will ultimately get a license from the state.

Other jobs still hang within the stability. Mohegan Sun narrowly lost a vote to approve a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in fact, that they are getting a official recount of the results later this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is taking into consideration the chance of changing their plan and placing the entirety of their casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Launch Isn’t Without Glitches

The newest Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which is why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of these online gambling platform was, for the most part, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, therefore the verification systems are doing their job. In fact, the only real problem is that those systems were working a little too hard, as quite several residents had difficulty proving they certainly were really in New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the soft launch regarding the first round of web gambling web sites went real time for players located in New Jersey. During the soft launch which is made to weed any bugs out and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were allowed for each site. Still, real money play was available, making this the very first time state-regulated online gambling had happened in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the time of the launch. They included the Borgata, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites were able to run 14 gambling internet sites, including a combination of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which runs to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to any or all residents in nj-new jersey older than 21 starting early week that is next. But according to some customers, there are definitely kinks in the system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, probably the most problem that is prevalent far had been also the one that was the many predictable. Numerous individuals had trouble signing into the sites due to the known reality that either the geolocation pc software being used could not be sure they were in New Jersey, or these people weren’t immediately able to meet other verification standards so that you can prove their residency.


For instance, some players attempted logging in from different locations and still couldn’t locate a real method to access any regarding the web sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from the McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various web sites that they couldn’t tell where he had been found, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. He then tried driving inland and north about five kilometers, but still could not have the sites to recognize he was at the state.

Driving another ten kilometers inland and trying to connect from a restaurant also failed to produce any results. While many associated with the sites now permitted him to register accounts, they nevertheless wanted some proof of residency such as for example a software application bill which he couldn’t straight away provide.

And Brennen had beenn’t the one that is only ran into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, nevertheless when I attempted to play they said I wasn’t in nj,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who had a long call with customer service and saw her computer crash while attempting to set an account up on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that when they try to repeat this statewide regarding the 26th, it is going to be mayhem.’

While few people reported those kinds of technical problems, the incapacity to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread. Even though many industry specialists predicted some individuals would get locked out from the sites due to being very near to the New Jersey border, it is unclear why this was occurring up to 10 to 15 miles far from the state’s borders as well.

Hopefully, these issues is going to be circumvented by the hard launch date to come.

‘ The opening that is soft be employed to show the division that most systems perform as required beneath the stress of real time gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls are effective. Staff will continually assess the progress of every platform provider before allowing them to open gaming to the public that is general November 26,’ said DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Controversy

Well-known person that is little star Peter Dinklage is unlikely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could possibly be viewed as exploitative or helpful according to your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the largest casino in great britain , has put out an advertisement to let the world understand he is looking to hire little individuals as ‘door dwarves’ at the venue for the vacations.

Risking being called a circus carney, the master promoted for the positions in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a group of Britain’s littlest bouncers Door Dwarves for its brand new entry in Cranbourn Street.’

Owner Claims Success

Based on reports, trials of this initiative, which would introduce a force of men and women 4 foot 10 inches or smaller to man the entry to the casino, were believed to went ‘fantastically’ well, so that as a result, the management at the venue has been convinced to introduce the system on a basis that is full-time.

CEO and president of the casino Simon Thomas, wanting to justify the scheme, explained to the news that the system was simply the latest in a long line of dwarf employment opportunities at the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is A london that is phenomenal organization. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor people like Little Titch on the cast,’ explained Thomas, adding that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and little person Tom Thumb perform at the place back the time.

‘We had high-diving dwarves whom dived from the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he included. ‘So they truly are very part that is much of history associated with the place.’

How charming can you get. It’s like Cirque du Soleil, nevertheless the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking figures, who the typical Joe would like not to get a cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does seem such as for instance a strange move for the casino if they’re seeking to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes by having a dwarf, so you might say, they truly are very doorman that is good’ argued Thomas. ‘They can manage people much better than having a individual eclipse on the door as some of the clubs do in London. No body will probably choose on someone who is below-average height. It’s not exactly a macho thing to do, so it is a very good way of controlling the entranceway.

‘ There isn’t any discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, gathering to borrow most likely the many over-used phrase of this 21st century to dispute complaints that the place could be poking fun at small people. ‘we find we are now living in a world of political correctness gone angry.’

But that it is, at the very least, exploiting them if we are to take the opinion that the job role is not poking fun at little people, should we perhaps take the opinion? Thomas himself reported that the initiative is ‘building on the heritage that is rich of entertainment’ so clearly it’s not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to use.

‘I have always been wanting to run a tremendously entertaining that is large and I also have a lot of different individuals with lots of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome chairman. ‘I have chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that task. They’re extremely expert and have got to get on with it.’